BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Philip Cryan Marshall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:06:08 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Leland,

ASTM: it's a long haul when you start out someting with ASTM. We ended up
drafting a mission statement for a "guidline standard" (quite distinct from
a "standard standard," of course) for HSRs in 1986. And between task groups,
sub-committees, committees and the general membership...it still has not
been released. And, once out, the results of, as I remember, draft #14, will
not meet our full expectations. But: it's better than nothing, or NPS-28
parkspeak that does not directly address private sector realities. What are
people referencing today when an RFP goes out for a HSR?

When it come to ASTM committees (as with, well, BP) membership  is all. If
you want to get involved, you can participate in development of a particular
"standard" by being on a Task Group, without having to even be a member of
ASTM. Past efforts by much of the preservation crew at WJE (Steve, Deborah,
Harry) to join ASTM and APT's work together has brought us a long way. APT
could continue to address needs, do much of the legwork in developing
standards for the profession, and bring stuff into ASTM at a later date.

Philip
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2