LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

   

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ... (4 messages)
Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry ..... (13 messages)
another example? (5 messages)
ASTM (2 messages)
ASTM standards on building preservation (1 message)
Attention, abalone slivers! (1 message)
Attention, brone salvors! (11 messages)
Attention, brone slivers! (2 messages)
Attention, stem salvors! (1 message)
Attention, stone salvors! (14 messages)
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Digest - 7 Feb 2009 to 8 Feb 2009 (#2009-36) (1 message)
Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post) (11 messages)
chalk drawings (7 messages)
Cold is a relative thing/Py in a dress (1 message)
dog standards on architect's b.... (7 messages)
drinking Australian wine (10 messages)
expansion joints from Dan Allen.... (2 messages)
Friendship is all about ... sharing. (5 messages)
FW: ASTM standards on building preservation (27 messages)
FW: Reference (9 messages)
good vs no good ideas (1 message)
I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy. (19 messages)
insulation query (1 message)
John Ashurst (1 message)
L-Soft Choice Awards (4 messages)
lake superior sandstone (2 messages)
narthex (2 messages)
new britain (3 messages)
new britain - clarification (2 messages)
paint mega-off brownstone (1 message)
Phillip Marshall (1 message)
pighabit (1 message)
Preservation Briefs (1 message)
PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009 (7 messages)
Py in a dress (1 message)
reactions to invading Italy in a Lamborarri (1 message)
Removal of cement render (15 messages)
Removal of cement render re-restoration (9 messages)
Removal of seement (5 messages)
Removal of seement render (10 messages)
Removal of the American Way Of Life (9 messages)
The nightmare of the Marquand stable, 166 East 73rd (1 message)
three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick (7 messages)
Three things I know about her (1 message)
Transfer of Trades Knowledge (7 messages)
treatments for rising damp and salt attack in buildings (3 messages)
Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression (4 messages)
What our conservation professionals are doing, chapter LCXXII (2 messages)
Woo-hoo! Re: [BP] PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009 (1 message)
yukon Guy (1 message)
Zinc statue (8 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ...

Re: "Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ...

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:42:04 -0500

122 lines

Re: "Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ...

Leland Torrence

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:33:10 -0500

313 lines

Re: "Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ...

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:54:30 -0500

88 lines

Re: "Another Wells design, the Russell and Erwin Building (also known as the ...

<>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:27:37 EST

110 lines

New Thread

Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Jim Follett

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:34:40 -0600

270 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:40:26 -0500

65 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Hammarberg, Eric

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:31:01 -0500

91 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:37:33 -0500

84 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Cuyler Page

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:36:01 -0800

132 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

<>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:14:35 EST

74 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Cuyler Page

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:08:41 -0800

80 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:56:24 -0500

154 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

<>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:19:18 -0500

131 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:08:06 -0500

133 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

<>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:33:07 EST

79 lines

Re: Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

<>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:31:26 EST

163 lines

Another damn thing we can blame on Frank Gehry .....

<>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:12:39 EST

112 lines

New Thread

another example?

Re: another example?

<>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:05:23 -0500

87 lines

Re: another example?

Gabriel Orgrease

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:31 -0500

70 lines

Re: another example?

<>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:54:16 EST

82 lines

Re: another example?

Hammarberg, Eric

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:33:17 -0500

205 lines

another example?

<>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:10:03 EST

102 lines

New Thread

ASTM

Re: ASTM

Leland Torrence

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:36:25 -0500

261 lines

Re: ASTM

<>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:18:03 EST

121 lines

New Thread

ASTM standards on building preservation

ASTM standards on building preservation

John Leeke

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:59:18 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Attention, abalone slivers!

Re: Attention, abalone slivers!

<>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:30:19 EST

72 lines

New Thread

Attention, brone salvors!

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Bowman, Camille

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:10:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:15:19 -0500

68 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:14:07 -0500

31 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:41:31 EST

71 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:39:31 EST

84 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Bowman, Camille

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:35:22 -0500

76 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Becker, Dan

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:27:17 -0500

58 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:20:16 -0500

62 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:19:49 -0500

174 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

Hammarberg, Eric

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:03:42 -0500

165 lines

Re: Attention, brone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:42:28 EST

68 lines

New Thread

Attention, brone slivers!

Re: Attention, brone slivers!

Bowman, Camille

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:13:27 -0500

201 lines

Re: Attention, brone slivers!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:01:06 EST

103 lines

New Thread

Attention, stem salvors!

Re: Attention, stem salvors!

Rudy R Christian

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:53:40 -0500

305 lines

New Thread

Attention, stone salvors!

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:52:43 -0500

117 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:51:37 EST

82 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:50:04 EST

81 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:45:32 -0500

128 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Edison Coatings

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:36:25 -0500

128 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Hammarberg, Eric

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:35:32 -0500

177 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:20:30 EST

83 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:16:46 EST

63 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:05:29 EST

81 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:05:47 -0500

71 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

John Walsh

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:30:14 +0000

216 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Hammarberg, Eric

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:19:42 -0500

184 lines

Re: Attention, stone salvors!

Edison Coatings

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:07:51 -0500

115 lines

Attention, stone salvors!

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:53:12 EST

67 lines

New Thread

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Digest - 7 Feb 2009 to 8 Feb 2009 (#2009-36)

Re: BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Digest - 7 Feb 2009 to 8 Feb 2009 (#2009-36)

<>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:37:42 EST

23 lines

New Thread

Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:52:14 -0500

896 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Rudy R Christian

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:53:43 -0500

753 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:31:52 -0500

448 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Rudy R Christian

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:22:03 -0500

462 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:13:23 -0500

203 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Rudy R Christian

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:53:57 -0500

177 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:32:58 EST

71 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:11:11 -0500

67 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:53:07 EST

61 lines

Re: Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:49:48 -0500

74 lines

Central Heating (irrelevant, time wasting post)

<>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:31:16 EST

66 lines

New Thread

chalk drawings

Re: chalk drawings

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:08:52 EST

128 lines

Re: chalk drawings

David West

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:20:37 +1100

353 lines

Re: chalk drawings

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:54:12 EST

77 lines

Re: chalk drawings

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:54:06 -0500

59 lines

Re: chalk drawings

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:09:32 EST

72 lines

Re: chalk drawings

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:12:34 -0500

67 lines

chalk drawings

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:47:21 EST

103 lines

New Thread

Cold is a relative thing/Py in a dress

Cold is a relative thing/Py in a dress

deb bledsoe

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:16:47 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

dog standards on architect's b....

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

Jim Follett

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:41:47 -0600

255 lines

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:25:19 -0500

86 lines

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

Rudy R Christian

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:54:38 -0500

182 lines

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:46:16 EST

125 lines

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:42:12 EST

75 lines

Re: dog standards on architect's b....

Rudy R Christian

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:38:51 -0500

162 lines

dog standards on architect's b....

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:34:17 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

drinking Australian wine

Re: drinking Australian wine

Jim Hicks

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:10:05 -0500

118 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:46:52 EST

156 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:20:12 EST

76 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

Jim Hicks

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:00:48 -0500

79 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

Larry Simpson

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:30:20 -0500

55 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:11:38 -0500

115 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

<>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:17:13 EST

93 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

Becker, Dan

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:43:38 -0500

37 lines

Re: drinking Australian wine

<>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:37:40 EST

91 lines

drinking Australian wine

David West

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:54:50 +1100

316 lines

New Thread

expansion joints from Dan Allen....

Re: expansion joints from Dan Allen....

Gabriel Orgrease

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:35:56 -0500

90 lines

expansion joints from Dan Allen....

<>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:01:02 EST

132 lines

New Thread

Friendship is all about ... sharing.

Re: Friendship is all about ... sharing.

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:10:47 EST

144 lines

Re: Friendship is all about ... sharing.

Jim Follett

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:09:16 -0600

225 lines

Re: Friendship is all about ... sharing.

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:06:25 -0500

71 lines

Re: Friendship is all about ... sharing.

Leland Torrence

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:18:38 -0500

254 lines

Friendship is all about ... sharing.

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:02:09 EST

95 lines

New Thread

FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:36:12 -0500

1347 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:24 +1100

1837 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:19:30 -0500

1043 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:09:50 +1100

1399 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:14:45 EST

105 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Edison Coatings

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:24:28 -0500

183 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:37:55 -0500

956 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Edison Coatings

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:57:27 -0500

566 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:22:41 -0500

74 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:21:17 -0500

341 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

<>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:28:00 EST

77 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:19:18 +1100

352 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:06:09 -0500

78 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:39:25 +1100

496 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:45:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:44:39 -0500

184 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Becker, Dan

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:20:30 -0500

57 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

John Walsh

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:12:30 -0500

265 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

John Walsh

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:56:15 -0500

778 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:54:57 -0500

178 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:35:37 -0500

614 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

John Walsh

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:46:02 -0500

572 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:38:39 -0500

486 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Leland Torrence

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:29:01 -0500

338 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:22:57 +1100

600 lines

Re: FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:35:48 -0500

219 lines

FW: ASTM standards on building preservation

David West

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:32:28 +1100

592 lines

New Thread

FW: Reference

Re: FW: Reference

Jim Hicks

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:26:54 -0500

254 lines

Re: FW: Reference

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:51:50 -0500

39 lines

Re: FW: Reference

Jim Hicks

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:38:43 -0500

71 lines

Re: FW: Reference

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:02:18 -0500

64 lines

Re: FW: Reference

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:45:44 EST

64 lines

Re: FW: Reference

PJ Morrissey

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:21:23 -0500

424 lines

Re: FW: Reference

Leland Torrence

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:48:30 -0500

221 lines

Re: FW: Reference

Edison Coatings

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:03:36 -0500

155 lines

FW: Reference

Jim Hicks

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:09:37 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

good vs no good ideas

good vs no good ideas

Gabriel Orgrease

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:54:02 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Jim Follett

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:56:05 -0600

46 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:55:02 -0500

29 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Rudy R Christian

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:32:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:27:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Jim Follett

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:57:50 -0600

69 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:40:54 -0500

144 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Ruth Barton

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:18:17 -0800

49 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:06:59 EST

84 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Jim Follett

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:02:37 -0600

308 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:03:22 EST

80 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:03:14 -0500

107 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:57:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:38:59 -0500

124 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Gabriel Orgrease

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:41:27 -0500

99 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Jim Follett

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:13:46 -0600

272 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Edison Coatings

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:11:02 -0500

85 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:03:20 EST

82 lines

Re: I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

Jim Follett

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:57:31 -0600

308 lines

I guess no one has any reactions to invading Italy.

<>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:54:45 EST

101 lines

New Thread

insulation query

Re: insulation query

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:13:54 EST

104 lines

New Thread

John Ashurst

John Ashurst

<>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:04:19 EST

64 lines

New Thread

L-Soft Choice Awards

Re: L-Soft Choice Awards

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:26:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: L-Soft Choice Awards

David West

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:34:31 +1100

102 lines

Re: L-Soft Choice Awards

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:21:45 EST

468 lines

L-Soft Choice Awards

Becker, Dan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:11:31 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

lake superior sandstone

Re: lake superior sandstone

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:01:07 -0500

68 lines

lake superior sandstone

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:57:27 EST

77 lines

New Thread

narthex

Re: narthex

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:38:07 EST

61 lines

narthex

Leland Torrence

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:11:47 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

new britain

Re: new britain

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:37:21 -0500

102 lines

Re: new britain

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:21:59 EST

102 lines

new britain

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:13:35 EST

67 lines

New Thread

new britain - clarification

Re: new britain - clarification

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:53:23 -0500

106 lines

Re: new britain - clarification

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:44:17 EST

84 lines

New Thread

paint mega-off brownstone

paint mega-off brownstone

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:52:09 EST

92 lines

New Thread

Phillip Marshall

Phillip Marshall

Leland Torrence

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:07:08 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

pighabit

pighabit

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:48:38 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Preservation Briefs

Preservation Briefs

John Leeke

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:22:11 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Ruth Barton

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:40:24 -0800

41 lines

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:01:28 -0500

213 lines

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Rudy R Christian

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:35:00 -0500

285 lines

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Hammarberg, Eric

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:24:55 -0500

187 lines

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:17:44 -0500

148 lines

Re: PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Larry Simpson

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:22:45 -0500

109 lines

PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:37:35 -0500

252 lines

New Thread

Py in a dress

Py in a dress

<>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:01:44 EST

74 lines

New Thread

reactions to invading Italy in a Lamborarri

reactions to invading Italy in a Lamborarri

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:36:58 EST

75 lines

New Thread

Removal of cement render

Removal of cement render

Ilene R. Tyler

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:56:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Patrick J Morrissey

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:53:04 +0000

156 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Jim Follett

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:47:27 -0600

289 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:41:18 EST

78 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:27:27 -0500

87 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:57:39 EST

86 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Hammarberg, Eric

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:02:39 -0500

212 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Larry Simpson

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:56:48 -0500

65 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Edison Coatings

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:01:06 -0500

126 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:23:22 -0500

90 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Hammarberg, Eric

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:33:00 -0500

93 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:13:43 -0500

88 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Hammarberg, Eric

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:54:54 -0500

186 lines

Re: Removal of cement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:42:00 -0500

191 lines

Removal of cement render

David West

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:18:31 +1100

261 lines

New Thread

Removal of cement render re-restoration

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

David West

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:24:51 +1100

544 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:01:59 -0500

99 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:49:19 -0500

78 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:36:20 EST

110 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:09:20 -0500

74 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

Hammarberg, Eric

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:24:34 -0500

164 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:22 EST

68 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

Hammarberg, Eric

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:08:34 -0500

139 lines

Re: Removal of cement render re-restoration

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:42:42 EST

122 lines

New Thread

Removal of seement

Re: Removal of seement

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:12:20 -0500

118 lines

Re: Removal of seement

Rudy R Christian

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:56:46 -0500

249 lines

Re: Removal of seement

Gabriel Orgrease

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:54:55 -0500

126 lines

Re: Removal of seement

David West

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:21:48 +1100

341 lines

Re: Removal of seement

<>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:42:00 EST

85 lines

New Thread

Removal of seement render

Re: Removal of seement render

Hammarberg, Eric

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:40:28 -0500

275 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Ruth Barton

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:55:02 -0800

48 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:59:39 EST

75 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:22:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Larry Simpson

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:52:45 -0500

36 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:43:48 -0500

172 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:25:06 -0500

68 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:13:52 -0500

134 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:54:59 -0500

86 lines

Re: Removal of seement render

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:30:30 EST

137 lines

New Thread

Removal of the American Way Of Life

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:34:43 EST

79 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:51:38 -0500

149 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:42:39 EST

76 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:31:22 -0500

79 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:29:05 -0500

132 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:04:35 EST

76 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

Kennedy, Patrick (Heritage Council)

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:06:36 -0500

91 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

Gabriel Orgrease

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:46:01 -0500

58 lines

Re: Removal of the American Way Of Life

<>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:39:47 EST

106 lines

New Thread

The nightmare of the Marquand stable, 166 East 73rd

The nightmare of the Marquand stable, 166 East 73rd

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:57:21 EST

128 lines

New Thread

three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

Larry Simpson

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:51:11 -0500

50 lines

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:02:15 -0500

116 lines

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

Gabriel Orgrease

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:57:06 -0500

39 lines

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:33:25 -0500

123 lines

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

Gabriel Orgrease

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:02:03 -0500

87 lines

Re: three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

Hammarberg, Eric

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:14:03 -0500

114 lines

three things I am thinking about, one of which is damaged brick

<>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:07:59 EST

83 lines

New Thread

Three things I know about her

Three things I know about her

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:17:37 EST

125 lines

New Thread

Transfer of Trades Knowledge

Re: Transfer of Trades Knowledge

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:05:12 -0500

47 lines

Transfer of Trades Knowledge

John Leeke

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:06:17 -0500

35 lines

Re: Transfer of Trades Knowledge

Leland Torrence

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:31 -0500

66 lines

Re: Transfer of Trades Knowledge

Gabriel Orgrease

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:53:46 -0500

35 lines

Re: Transfer of Trades Knowledge

Leland Torrence

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:14:53 -0500

166 lines

Re: Transfer of Trades Knowledge

David West

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:00:30 +1100

135 lines

Transfer of Trades Knowledge

John Leeke

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:37:44 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

treatments for rising damp and salt attack in buildings

Re: treatments for rising damp and salt attack in buildings

David West

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:11:36 +1100

841 lines

Re: treatments for rising damp and salt attack in buildings

Hammarberg, Eric

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:19:30 -0500

416 lines

treatments for rising damp and salt attack in buildings

David West

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:15:18 +1100

308 lines

New Thread

Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression

Re: Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression

Hammarberg, Eric

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:51:05 -0500

293 lines

Re: Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression

Becker, Dan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:52:08 -0500

62 lines

Re: Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression

Rudy R Christian

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:31:17 -0500

532 lines

Two Questions: Insulation and Fire Suppression

Bowman, Camille

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:15:31 -0500

159 lines

New Thread

What our conservation professionals are doing, chapter LCXXII

Re: What our conservation professionals are doing, chapter LCXXII

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:48:13 -0500

116 lines

What our conservation professionals are doing, chapter LCXXII

<>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:05:34 EST

99 lines

New Thread

Woo-hoo! Re: [BP] PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Woo-hoo! Re: [BP] PTN/TFG/KY Preservation Rendezvous 2009

Deborah Mills Woodcarving

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:38:45 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

yukon Guy

Re: yukon Guy

<>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:00:11 EST

112 lines

New Thread

Zinc statue

Re: Zinc statue

Becker, Dan

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:56:19 -0500

82 lines

Re: Zinc statue

<>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:22:26 EST

74 lines

Re: Zinc statue

<>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:05:51 EST

69 lines

Re: Zinc statue

<>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:03:54 EST

65 lines

Re: Zinc statue

Gabriel Orgrease

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:45:29 -0500

72 lines

Re: Zinc statue

<>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:33:15 EST

95 lines

Re: Zinc statue

Hammarberg, Eric

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:24:46 -0500

122 lines

Re: Zinc statue

<>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:17:54 EST

81 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2016
March 2016
December 2015
November 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager